Lately I've been working on a little romance story for a certain challenge, and a challenge it's proving to be; romance isn't my usual cup of green tea (you heard me).
It got me thinking though about the emotion known as love and the strange connection it has to war, as the famous saying goes. What is it about love that has it being compared with something so clearly its opposite?
Is it the passion? Soldiers are known to go all out to defend the sovereignity of their homeland, similar to two suitors hell bent on wooing the woman of their dreams. Is it the mental anguish? The horrors a soldier faces on the battlefield can also just as easily be seen on the faces of the spurned suitor.
Are we all subject to the same laws that dictate wartime conduct in our quest for love? Does the Geneva Convention cover the treatment of heart-broken men and women? Break the laws of attraction, skip past first and go straight to third base, break the sacred trust of friendship and face the wrath of a military tribunal?
Ah, if only things were so simple. Over the millenia, we have goen through war after war and with each war we grow wiser and more civilized, thus forming the basis of the sacred rules governing war-time conduct, hallmarks of our evolution in dealing with the most sensitive and explosive of issues.
The game of love, as explosive an issue as any, though knows no laws because, even after millenia of refining the act of seduction, we have still not reached the finesse we so desire. We stab each other in the back, resort to blackmail, propaganda, outright intimidation and delicate mind games, ignore all laws of decency and honour, all for the hand of the subject of our affections. After all this time have we ever gotten past the level of neanderthals clubbing each other on the head before carting off the loser's mate on his shoulder?
I think not. And who cares?
Laws were meant to be broken.